Purpose: The science of interpretation, as the most important science responsible for understanding the Qur'an, needs to be methodized and updated so that the teachings of the Qur'an can be used easily for all classes of people. In the present study, the meaning of "FUTURE research in interpretation" is the ability to create desirable models for more efficient interpretation in the FUTURE, by using scientific tools, creativity and relying on the foundations and rules of interpretation and compensating the damages of interpretation in the past.Method: This research, with descriptive analytical method, answers the question, what are the fields and requirements of FUTURE research in interpretation? Findings: The results of the current research are based on the fact that special attention to the Qur'an, as the most important source of interpretation, rationality and methodical consideration in interpretation, attention to the prerequisites of interpretation, interpretation based on the requirements of the time, the need to pay attention to thematic interpretation, studying on the history of interpretation and observing the manners and conditions of interpretation are one of the most important requirements of interpretation in the FUTURE. Results: Considering the developments that will take place in the field of knowledge, methods and expectations from science in the FUTURE, the interpretation will also change. For this reason, in order not to cause various damages to the interpretation of the Qur'an, it is necessary to pay attention to the various contexts, principles and requirements of the interpretation of the Qur'anic commentators and scholars.

In This Essay Is Trying to Study The Relation Between Islam and DEMOCRACY In Model of Deep DEMOCRACY and Committed DEMOCRACY. Thus, I Study This Relation in on Seven Factors of Concepts of DEMOCRACY (Political or Philosophical), Awareness From outside, Multi Approach to DEMOCRACY, Community nd Self Interaction, Communication, Situated Self and Pluralism, That Are Beyond of Current Liberal DEMOCRACY in The West, and Criticize It. This Factors Are Basis of Deep DEMOCRACY. And, Because Committed DEMOCRACY Is Taking From Shariati, s Thought, Then This DEMOCRACY Relyed on Shariati, s Thought. Finally, Is Resulted That, Shariati, s Reading on Islam, in This Sight, Is Democratic.

There are two general views on the impact of technology on DEMOCRACY: a (technology is a threat to DEMOCRACY, b) technology provides proper grounds for DEMOCRACY.The aim of this article is to study the consequences of the influence of technology on DEMOCRACY. Taking technologistic and cultural approaches, this paper studies the influence of technology on the four components of DEMOCRACY as a government system- decision making policy, human beings as decision makers, community as consisting of individuals, and procedures of determining destiny-and argues that technology is an integral part of DEMOCRACY in modern technological era to the extent that it entails making the new term as «technological DEMOCRACY. This term overshadows the question of whether technology is a threat or opportunity to DEMOCRACY. The question would be significant, when its purpose is to reconcile DEMOCRACY and technology.

Deconstruction is a strategy for demonstrating the contribution of philosophy to achieving the meaning of DEMOCRACY in the postmodern world. It seeks to establish philosophical principles consistent with the principle of tolerating others and DEMOCRACY in the post-DEMOCRACY world. Meanwhile, Derrida's ideas in the field of socio-political DEMOCRACY, such as FUTURE DEMOCRACY and its oncoming challenges, are also rooted in his philosophy. Hence, DEMOCRACY and deconstruction are the two sides of a coin, and one cannot be understood without the other. This connection is unbreakable and necessary and pivotal to Derrida's thinking about philosophy and politics. The breakthrough has come to suggest new horizons with the critique of modern systems including Western democracies that marginalized forces on the frontiers of DEMOCRACY can actively participate in determining their own destinies. Contrary to positive methods, the underlying breach does not have a relative relation with the ultimate clarity of the Western society, and it is considered to be the fruits of the linear maturity of history. On the contrary, with the critique of metaphysical systems, it is a strategic breakthrough, so that the inertia of the universe becomes the instrument of successive negotiation. As far as the subject of this article is concerned, it attempts to define the Western metaphysical breakdown, then it shows how Derrida has benefited from this strategy in order to open up the political blockade of Western democratization with ongoing openings. The study of the link between deconstructive philosophy and DEMOCRACY and how they interact with each other will be the cornerstone of this article.

Deconstruction is a strategy for demonstrating the contribution of philosophy to achieving the meaning of DEMOCRACY in the postmodern world. It seeks to establish philosophical principles consistent with the principle of tolerating others and DEMOCRACY in the post-DEMOCRACY world. Meanwhile, Derrida's ideas in the field of socio-political DEMOCRACY, such as FUTURE DEMOCRACY and its oncoming challenges, are also rooted in his philosophy. Hence, DEMOCRACY and deconstruction are the two sides of a coin, and one cannot be understood without the other. This connection is unbreakable and necessary and pivotal to Derrida's thinking about philosophy and politics. The breakthrough has come to suggest new horizons with the critique of modern systems including Western democracies that marginalized forces on the frontiers of DEMOCRACY can actively participate in determining their own destinies. Contrary to positive methods, the underlying breach does not have a relative relation with the ultimate clarity of the Western society, and it is considered to be the fruits of the linear maturity of history. On the contrary, with the critique of metaphysical systems, it is a strategic breakthrough, so that the inertia of the universe becomes the instrument of successive negotiation. As far as the subject of this article is concerned, it attempts to define the Western metaphysical breakdown, then it shows how Derrida has benefited from this strategy in order to open up the political blockade of Western democratization with ongoing openings. The study of the link between deconstructive philosophy and DEMOCRACY and how they interact with each other will be the cornerstone of this article.

The deconstructionist philosophy is a good example to show how systematic philosophy corresponds with DEMOCRACY. Through criticizing egocentrism and enmity to others, deconstructionism is after relating the philosophical principles with the principle of acceptance of others and DEMOCRACY. On the other hand Derrida' s discussion of socio-political DEMOCRACY like DEMOCRACY of the FUTURE and the challenges DEMOCRACY faces, also have its roots in his philosophical thinking. So DEMOCRACY and deconstructionism are two sides of the same coin and it is not possible to understand one without understanding the other. This is a strong relation and Derrida's idea about philosophy and politics is based on it. The DEMOCRACY of FUTURE as the result of this relation is the mirror of Derridean philosophy and politics. The relation between philosophy and deconstructionist DEMOCRACY and their interaction and effects on each other are among the main concerns of this paper.

Purpose: The FUTURE of the construction industry is increasingly influenced by new technologies. In order to adopt appropriate strategies in facing new technologies, it is necessary to know the possible FUTUREs of the construction industry. This research was done with the aim of explaining the technological uncertainties and compiling the FUTURE scenarios of the construction industry.  Method: The research method is applied and was carried out with a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. First, the library study was used to determine the technological drivers, then the Structural Analysis was used to explain the technological uncertainties, and finally, the Schwartz method was used to compile the scenarios. The statistical population is experts of construction industry. Findings: Nine technological uncertainties affecting the FUTURE of the construction industry have been identified and for each of them, three states of decline, stagnation and progress have been considered. Data analysis by Scenario Wizard shows eight probable scenarios. The portfolio of scenarios including four groups of progress scenarios, towards progress, towards stagnation, and towards wane has been compiled. Conclusion: In the progress scenario, the 89% of uncertainties have developed. In  towards progress, 56% of the factors are in the development status, which indicates the development of the technological factor application. In the stagnation scenario, no progress has been made in the application of uncertainties and they are in a static state. In towards wane, uncertainties have been placed in a situation of reduced use.